You’ve seen me cover a potential solution for an alternative fuel in the form of algae, perhaps one of our most plentiful natural resources. Now I’m going to cover alternatives in the area of power production.
Electrical power is necessary. It powers a great many of our appliances. There’s only one problem: right now our power is produced by power plants that throw out a bunch of pollutants into our atmosphere. Could there be an economically viable free-market solution to cheap energy that is environmentally friendly? Let’s explore some of these options.
By far the option for which I hold a great deal of skepticism is one I came across on the internet. It involves building a device capable of harnessing supposedly free electrical energy. It involves the theories of Nikola Tesla, an undisputed genius in the field of harnessing electrical energy. The world of AC power was built using many of Tesla’s patents. The theory is that there is a great wealth of electrical energy trapped in the ionosphere and the proposed device would harness it. More information on this device can be found here:
Some of the less far-fetched ideas include such things as solar, wind, geothermal and hydropower. Solar and wind power pose 2 problems. The primary problem is that both methods of power generation rely on a near constant supply of favorable weather conditions, a rather large statistical impossibility. The second problem is that wind turbines and solar panels cost a mint to manufacture and install. If anybody who reads this blog knows of less costly ways that solar and wind power can be harnessed, please be my guest and by all means leave a comment or perhaps a link to your blog where you may have addressed it.
Geothermal power generation also poses certain dangers that give me serious doubts as to whether or not the benefit outweighs the risk. One wrong move tapping into a geothermal vent and you could have an environmental disaster on your hands rivaling Chernobyl.
Hydropower is by far our most viable option at the moment I think. Hydropower involves using the force of moving water to rotate a large turbine. the rotation of the turbine produces mechanical energy that can then be converted into electrical power.
But perhaps another method can be devised that would be on par with hydropower. Because hydropower has one drawback. In desert areas that are nowhere near any bodies of water, those areas would not be able to make use of any of it. This method carries the misnomer of “perpetual motion machine,” a thought that is the fanciful product of pseudoscience. But i think it might be possible to have a turbine similar to the kind used in hydropower plants. But instead of the force of moving water being applied to the turbine, the turbine is instead made to rotate by the application of magnetic force. Magneto-power anyone?
So what do you think? Is there anything to that Tesla device or should we stick with what we know works? Or could magnetopower be the wave of the future, especially for dry areas that don’t have enough water to make use of hydropower? Although it would be the height of irony if the answer to our energy crisis did originate with a man who lived over 100 years ago.